top of page

How would ‘Obamacare’ repeal affect Blacks

Racism has historically had a significant negative impact on the health care of Blacks and other people of color in the United States. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is truly the first time that African-Americans have collectively had significant access to health care. America’s first African-American president is chiefly responsible for this access.

Improved access to care, Medicaid expansion, preventative medicine, and lifting barriers for pre-existing conditions are all aspects of the ACA that have been of great benefit to Blacks.

Major uncertainty

But there is a thick air of uncertainty on the horizon when Donald John Trump becomes the 45th president of the United States. It is unclear how quickly, or when, Trump’s vow to repeal and replace the ACA will play out.

But just like the adage, “When White folks catch a cold, Black folks get pneumonia,” a repeal of the ACA would disproportionately hurt Blacks.

Republicans in Congress have put out their plans: to repeal most of the ACA without replacing it – doubling the number of uninsured people from roughly 29 million to 59 million – and leaving the nation with an even higher uninsured rate than before the ACA.

How we benefited

Here a few ways that Blacks have specifically benefitted from the ACA, also known as “Obamacare.”

Nearly all (94 percent) uninsured Blacks are in the income range to qualify for the Medicaid expansion or premium tax credits. Nearly two-thirds (62 percent) of uninsured Blacks have incomes at or below the Medicaid expansion limit. An additional 31 percent are income-eligible for tax subsidies to help cover the cost of buying health insurance through the exchange marketplaces.

Insurance companies are now banned from denying coverage because of a pre-existing condition, such as cancer and having been pregnant. For people living with HIV, there also new protections in the law that make access to health coverage more equitable, including a prohibition on rate-setting tied to health status, and an end to lifetime and annual caps.

Hospitals could lose

Safety net hospitals play a critical role in the nation’s health care system by serving low-income, uninsured and medically and socially vulnerable patients regardless of their ability to pay. In agreeing to lower payments, hospitals in the 31 states that expanded Medicaid under the law have made up that revenue in part through the Medicaid expansion. These places are critical to the health of Black communities, and in the poorest neighborhoods.

They have been among the loudest voices against repeal of the health law, as they could lose billions if the 20 million people lose the insurance they gained under the law. This could bring about widespread layoffs, cuts in outpatient care and services for the mentally ill, and even hospital closings.

Under the ACA, these hospitals have received subsidies (or credits) to provide care based on a patients’ income levels. Should this change, community hospitals may have more difficulty weathering the storm of an increase in the number of uninsured.

Some problems

Admittedly, there are some real problems with the ACA, including steady increases in premiums (midrange plans increased 22 percent nationally in 2016, with the average premium set to rise 25 percent in 2017). Nearly 70 percent of all ACA plan provider networks are narrower than promised.

There are high deductibles and co-pays. Perhaps the most universal complaint is the “individual mandate” that requires all Americans to have insurance, or face a financial penalty.

Repeal underway

Republicans are dead-set on repealing Obamacare. Congress has passed significant modifications this month, which will be signed by incoming President Trump.

The plans they have proposed so far would leave millions of people without insurance and make it harder for sicker, older Americans to access coverage. No version of a Republican plan would keep the Medicaid expansion as Obamacare envisions it.

Donald Trump’s presidency absolutely puts the ACA’s future in jeopardy. Changes are needed, but the idea of dismantling it remains a troubling prospect for Blacks.

Glenn Ellis is a regular media contributor on health equity and medical ethics. For more information, visit

bottom of page